By Kevin Grady Case No.: No. 4D2024-1547 (Dec. 17, 2025) (Fourth District Court of Appeal) The Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed a jury’s finding that the insureds’ had failed to provide prompt notice of a loss event, and such failure prejudiced the insurer’s claim investigation and final judgment was entered for the insurer. The District Court of Appeal found…

By: Schyeler S. Gilman Case No. 2:24-cv-417-KCD-DNF (Dec. 10, 2025) (United States District Court Middle District of Florida, Fort Myers Division) The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida granted Plaintiff’s, Pleasant Hill Christian Church Ministries, Inc., Motion for Summary Judgment against Ohio Security Insurance Company. The case arises from damage to Pleasant Hill’s building caused by…

By: Schyeler S. Gilman No. 4D2024-0098 (4th DCA 6/4/2025) (District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District) On June 4, 2025, the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed a $47,006.80 jury verdict in favor of the insured, finding the trial court abused its discretion by allowing evidence of claims‑handling in a case pled solely as breach of contract, reinforcing that…

By: Schyeler S. Gilman 49 Fla. L. Weekly D360, --So.3d --, 2024 WL 591695 (Fla. 3d DCA Feb. 14, 2024) On February 14, 2024, Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal ruled that Fla. Stat. §627.70152(3), requiring a written pre-suit notice of intent to litigate be submitted to the Department of Financial Services, applies retroactively to insurance policies that pre-date the…

By Allison Van Fleet No. 3D23-1934, 2024 WL 1894872, -- So.3d -- (Fla 3d DCA May 1, 2024). The Insured in the underlying suit sought certiorari review of an order granting a motion for protective order in favor of the­ Insurer. After reviewing the order, the Third District Court of Appeal quashed the original order entered. The underlying order allowed…

By: Marissa Levy No. 5D22-1404, 2023 WL 8285681, 374 So. 3d 934 (Fla. 5th DCA 2023) The Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District, recently held that the meaning of the word “incur” in a tear out clause for a homeowners insurance policy issued by State Farm Insurance Company did not require the homeowner to enter into a non-voidable repair…

By: Marissa Levy No. 4D22-865 (4th DCA 08/30/2023) The Fourth District Court of Appeal recently addressed the issue of insurance claim denials for long term water seepage. The Court held that the insured has the burden of proving a loss took place while the policy was in effect, the insurer has the burden of proving the loss is excluded from…

By: Nicole Martingano Case No. 5D22-72 The Fifth District Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s ruling on the basis that the entry of judgment on merits based on an appraisal award, without considering coverage defenses, violated the insurer’s due process rights. Following a hailstorm, a scope-and-price dispute regarding damages to the Hochreiters’ (“Insureds”) roof arose. State Farm responded to…

By: Andrew Leslie No. 22-11776 (11th Cir. Apr. 13, 2023). On April 13, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit addressed an “important and (as it turns out) interesting” issue concerning the interpretation of coverage from losses resulting from “named windstorms” within two consecutive written insurance policies.  On appeal from the U.S. District Court for the…

By: Allison J. Van Fleet No. 5D21-1354, 2022 WL 1814253 (5th DCA 06/03/2022) (District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District) The Fifth District Court of Appeals addressed whether a trial court may compel appraisal on the insured’s initial and supplemental claims before the insurer’s determination of coverage of the entire claim. The Fifth District held that a trial court…